日本語
Microplastics databaseSeasonings and sweetenersChecked 2026-10-01

Microplastics in honey and sugar

A 2013 German study reported finding many fibers and fragments in honey and sugar. But it only counted colored particles under a microscope and did not confirm the material. A 2017 study that re-examined particles one by one by spectroscopy found that many of the black particles were soot from beekeepers’ smokers, and concluded that there was “no sign of significant contamination of honey.”

Amounts found in studies

StudyWhat was testedSize range and methodResults
Liebezeit & Liebezeit (2013)Honey and sugarOnly colored particles counted visually (no identification by spectroscopy)Honey: an average of 166 fibers per kg. Refined sugar: an average of 217 fibers
Mühlschlegel et al. (2017)HoneyEach particle identified by Raman and FTIRThe black particles (1,760–8,680 per kg) were charcoal and soot. Fibers were mainly cellulose or PET. “No sign of significant contamination”

Results can differ by orders of magnitude depending on the smallest particle size counted and whether particles are counted or weighed. Numbers from different studies cannot be compared directly (→ Why numbers differ).

Good to know

  • Counting by appearance alone (color, shape) can include particles that are not plastic, such as cotton and soot (→ How measurement changes the numbers).

Data from Japan

We found no study of honey or sugar from Japan.

Related explainers

Sources

Last checked 2026-10-01. “Confirmed in the abstract” means we report only what the paper's abstract says. This page is a translation of our Japanese page; if they differ, the Japanese page is the reference.

Public bodies such as WHO, FAO and EFSA do not currently recommend that individuals avoid any particular food because of microplastics. This page lists facts from research and public agencies' documents; it does not judge whether a food is good or bad.

More in “Seasonings and sweeteners”

← Back to the microplastics database