日本語
Microplastics databaseWater and beveragesChecked 2026-10-01

Microplastics in drinks in glass bottles

In a survey published in 2025 by a research team at the French Agency for Food, Environmental and Occupational Health & Safety (ANSES), glass-bottled cola, lemonade, iced tea and beer contained more microplastics than the same drinks in plastic bottles or cans. From the color and material of the particles, the source is thought to be the paint on the outside of the metal caps.

Amounts found in studies

StudyWhat was testedSize range and methodResults
Chaïb et al. (2025, ANSES) cola1 brand, 6 bottles per container type0.03–0.5 mm, identified by FTIR, with blank and recovery testsPer L: glass bottle 103.4 particles, plastic bottle 2.1, can 3.4
Same, lemonadeSame as aboveSame as aboveGlass bottle 111.6, plastic bottle 1.5, can 10.9
Same, iced teaSame as aboveSame as aboveGlass bottle 86.3, plastic bottle 2.2, can 16.3
Same, beerSame as aboveSame as aboveSmall bottle 133.7, large bottle 32.8, can 31.8
Same, water and wineSame as aboveSame as aboveWater: glass bottle 4.5, plastic bottle 1.6. Wine in cork-stoppered glass bottles was low at 5.3, and cartons were the highest at 30.0
Same, cap experiment0.33 L cola bottles, new caps10 bottles eachAs is: 287.3 → after blowing air: 105.8 → blowing air plus rinsing: 86.7

Results can differ by orders of magnitude depending on the smallest particle size counted and whether particles are counted or weighed. Numbers from different studies cannot be compared directly (→ Why numbers differ).

Good to know

  • Most of the particles found were the same color as the cap, and the material was also polyester-based, like the paint. The outside of the caps had scratches before use, and flakes of paint were stuck on the inside.
  • ANSES says “because there is no toxicological reference value, we cannot say whether there is a health risk,” and suggests that manufacturers review how caps are cleaned and stored before capping (June 20, 2025).
  • There are critical comments that smaller containers look worse when compared per L, that sources other than the container, such as the filling line, were not considered (Muncke et al. 2025). Particles under 0.03 mm were not counted, and the number of samples is small.
  • In bottled-water studies too, Oßmann 2018, which counted down to 0.001 mm, found more in glass bottles. It is not necessarily true that “glass means less.”

Data from Japan

We found no study that measured bottled or canned drinks in Japan.

Types of plastic found

Related explainers

Sources

Last checked 2026-10-01. “Confirmed in the abstract” means we report only what the paper's abstract says. This page is a translation of our Japanese page; if they differ, the Japanese page is the reference.

Public bodies such as WHO, FAO and EFSA do not currently recommend that individuals avoid any particular food because of microplastics. This page lists facts from research and public agencies' documents; it does not judge whether a food is good or bad.

More in “Water and beverages”

← Back to the microplastics database