日本語
Fact checkChecked 2026-09-29

Why Is Lung Cancer Rising When Fewer People Smoke? Smoking, Lung Cancer Types, and What You Can Do for Your Lungs, Checked Against National Data and Studies

PR This article contains affiliate links to Rakuten Ichiba and A8.net (“See on Rakuten”, “See the trial set”, “【ミヤモトオレンジガーデン本店】”). What is written here is based on national statistics and published studies, whether or not there is an ad. The “See on Amazon.co.jp” and “See on Yahoo! Shopping” links are also affiliate links.

Japan’s male smoking rate fell from 83.7% in 1966 to 27.8% in 2018 (JT “National Survey of Smoking Rates”). In the 2024 national survey, 14.8% of people aged 20 and over smoked habitually (24.5% of men, 6.5% of women) (MHLW “National Health and Nutrition Survey”).

Even so, deaths from lung cancer kept rising and reached a record 76,663 in 2022. They are still above 75,000 a year, and lung cancer is the leading cause of cancer death (National Cancer Center Japan, Cancer Statistics).

Some people ask, “If more people have quit smoking and lung cancer is still rising, doesn’t that mean tobacco has nothing to do with it?”

This article uses national statistics and studies to check:

  • Why lung cancer seems to be rising even though fewer people smoke
  • How the link to smoking differs by lung cancer type (adenocarcinoma, squamous cell carcinoma, small cell carcinoma, and others)
  • What is known about the causes of lung cancer in people who do not smoke
  • How solid the evidence is for actions, foods, and habits said to be good for the lungs

Conclusion

  • The number of people who die of lung cancer has risen, but the death rate compared at the same ages has been falling since its 1996 peak. The age-adjusted death rate fell 33% for men and 21% for women between 1996 and 2024
  • The biggest reason for the rise in numbers is population aging. The share of lung cancer deaths in people aged 75 and over rose from 23% in 1975 to 70% in 2024. If the 1996 age-specific death rates were applied to the 2024 population, deaths would be about 92,000, but the actual figure was about 76,000
  • There is a time lag of 20 years or more between smoking and lung cancer. The generations that smoked heavily are now old enough for lung cancer. The lung cancer death rate for men in their 50s and 60s fell by roughly 40% to 60% between 1996 and 2024
  • The strength of the link to smoking differs by type of lung cancer. Squamous cell carcinoma and small cell carcinoma are especially strongly linked to smoking: in a Japanese study, male smokers had about 12 times the risk of squamous cell carcinoma of non-smokers. Adenocarcinoma is common in non-smokers too, and smoking raises its risk by a smaller factor, about 2
  • As smokers have decreased, squamous cell carcinoma and small cell carcinoma have declined, and adenocarcinoma is now the most common. Adenocarcinomas found at an early stage are increasing in particular, and easier detection through screening is thought to be part of the reason
  • Lung cancer in people who do not smoke is linked to secondhand smoke (rated “convincing” by the National Cancer Center Japan), workplace asbestos (“probable”), air pollution (PM2.5), radon, cooking fumes, and more
  • The actions with clear evidence for your lungs are quitting smoking (at any age) and avoiding secondhand smoke. Fruit, vegetables, and exercise are at the “possibly lowers risk” level, and beta-carotene supplements are known to raise lung cancer in smokers
  • Heated tobacco has fewer harmful substances than cigarettes in many cases, but more of some, and its link to lung cancer is “unable to judge”, according to the May 2026 summary by an MHLW research group

Smoking rates and lung cancer over time

Smoking rates, lung cancer deaths, and age-adjusted death rates (1958–2024)The male smoking rate fell from 83.7% in 1966 to 27.8% in 2018. Lung cancer deaths rose to 76,663 in 2022 and were 75,569 in 2024. The age-adjusted death rate for men peaked at 48.1 in 1996 and fell to 32.1 in 2024; for women it fell from 12.6 in 1996 to 10.0 in 2024.Adult smoking rate (%, JT survey, 1965–2018)02550751001965 Men 82.3%1966 Men 83.7%1967 Men 82.3%1968 Men 78.5%1969 Men 79.1%1970 Men 77.5%1971 Men 77.4%1972 Men 77.6%1973 Men 78.3%1974 Men 78.8%1975 Men 76.2%1976 Men 75.1%1977 Men 75.1%1978 Men 74.7%1979 Men 73.1%1980 Men 70.2%1981 Men 70.8%1982 Men 70.1%1983 Men 66.1%1984 Men 65.5%1985 Men 64.6%1986 Men 62.5%1987 Men 61.6%1988 Men 61.2%1989 Men 61.1%1990 Men 60.5%1991 Men 61.2%1992 Men 60.4%1993 Men 59.8%1994 Men 59.0%1995 Men 58.8%1996 Men 57.5%1997 Men 56.1%1998 Men 55.2%1999 Men 54.0%2000 Men 53.5%2001 Men 52.0%2002 Men 49.1%2003 Men 48.3%2004 Men 46.9%2005 Men 45.8%2006 Men 41.3%2007 Men 40.2%2008 Men 39.5%2009 Men 38.9%2010 Men 36.6%2011 Men 33.7%2012 Men 32.7%2013 Men 32.2%2014 Men 30.3%2015 Men 31.0%2016 Men 29.7%2017 Men 28.2%2018 Men 27.8%Men, 1966: 83.7%27.8%1965 Women 15.7%1966 Women 18.0%1967 Women 17.7%1968 Women 15.4%1969 Women 15.4%1970 Women 15.6%1971 Women 14.7%1972 Women 15.5%1973 Women 15.1%1974 Women 16.7%1975 Women 15.1%1976 Women 15.4%1977 Women 15.1%1978 Women 16.2%1979 Women 15.4%1980 Women 14.4%1981 Women 15.3%1982 Women 15.4%1983 Women 13.5%1984 Women 14.0%1985 Women 13.7%1986 Women 12.6%1987 Women 13.4%1988 Women 13.1%1989 Women 12.7%1990 Women 14.3%1991 Women 14.2%1992 Women 13.3%1993 Women 13.3%1994 Women 14.8%1995 Women 15.2%1996 Women 14.2%1997 Women 14.5%1998 Women 13.3%1999 Women 14.5%2000 Women 13.7%2001 Women 14.7%2002 Women 14.0%2003 Women 13.6%2004 Women 13.2%2005 Women 13.8%2006 Women 12.4%2007 Women 12.7%2008 Women 12.9%2009 Women 11.9%2010 Women 12.1%2011 Women 10.6%2012 Women 10.4%2013 Women 10.5%2014 Women 9.8%2015 Women 9.6%2016 Women 9.7%2017 Women 9.0%2018 Women 8.7%Women, 1966: 18.0%8.7%1960198020002020Lung cancer deaths (Japan, number of people)020k40k60k80k1958: 4,271 deaths1959: 4,739 deaths1960: 5,171 deaths1961: 5,698 deaths1962: 6,227 deaths1963: 6,736 deaths1964: 7,172 deaths1965: 7,725 deaths1966: 8,365 deaths1967: 8,862 deaths1968: 9,365 deaths1969: 10,133 deaths1970: 10,489 deaths1971: 11,129 deaths1972: 12,290 deaths1973: 12,856 deaths1974: 13,716 deaths1975: 14,759 deaths1976: 15,869 deaths1977: 17,235 deaths1978: 18,530 deaths1979: 19,923 deaths1980: 21,294 deaths1981: 22,799 deaths1982: 24,216 deaths1983: 25,651 deaths1984: 27,356 deaths1985: 28,590 deaths1986: 29,535 deaths1987: 31,729 deaths1988: 33,388 deaths1989: 35,477 deaths1990: 36,486 deaths1991: 38,199 deaths1992: 40,163 deaths1993: 41,527 deaths1994: 43,476 deaths1995: 45,745 deaths1996: 48,041 deaths1997: 48,994 deaths1998: 50,871 deaths1999: 52,177 deaths2000: 53,724 deaths2001: 55,034 deaths2002: 56,405 deaths2003: 56,720 deaths2004: 59,922 deaths2005: 62,063 deaths2006: 63,255 deaths2007: 65,608 deaths2008: 66,849 deaths2009: 67,583 deaths2010: 69,813 deaths2011: 70,293 deaths2012: 71,518 deaths2013: 72,734 deaths2014: 73,396 deaths2015: 74,382 deaths2016: 73,860 deaths2017: 74,127 deaths2018: 74,328 deaths2019: 75,394 deaths2020: 75,585 deaths2021: 76,212 deaths2022: 76,663 deaths2023: 75,762 deaths2024: 75,569 deaths1958: 4,2712022: 76,6631996: 48,041Dotted line: 19961960198020002020Age-adjusted lung cancer death rate (per 100,000)02040601958 Men 11.31959 Men 12.61960 Men 13.61961 Men 14.31962 Men 15.41963 Men 16.51964 Men 17.31965 Men 18.11966 Men 19.11967 Men 20.21968 Men 20.91969 Men 22.21970 Men 22.51971 Men 23.61972 Men 25.31973 Men 25.81974 Men 27.21975 Men 28.11976 Men 29.61977 Men 31.31978 Men 32.51979 Men 34.51980 Men 35.51981 Men 37.21982 Men 38.01983 Men 39.31984 Men 40.71985 Men 41.51986 Men 41.11987 Men 42.81988 Men 43.71989 Men 45.01990 Men 45.01991 Men 45.31992 Men 45.81993 Men 46.11994 Men 46.71995 Men 47.51996 Men 48.11997 Men 47.31998 Men 47.31999 Men 47.02000 Men 46.32001 Men 45.62002 Men 45.32003 Men 44.22004 Men 45.22005 Men 44.62006 Men 44.02007 Men 44.02008 Men 43.52009 Men 42.52010 Men 42.42011 Men 41.72012 Men 41.02013 Men 40.42014 Men 39.72015 Men 39.22016 Men 37.62017 Men 36.82018 Men 35.52019 Men 35.32020 Men 34.82021 Men 34.22022 Men 33.92023 Men 32.92024 Men 32.1Men, 1996: 48.132.11958 Women 4.41959 Women 4.51960 Women 4.81961 Women 5.31962 Women 5.61963 Women 5.81964 Women 6.01965 Women 6.51966 Women 6.81967 Women 6.81968 Women 6.91969 Women 7.31970 Women 7.31971 Women 7.31972 Women 7.91973 Women 7.91974 Women 8.01975 Women 8.31976 Women 8.91977 Women 9.01978 Women 9.51979 Women 9.61980 Women 10.21981 Women 10.41982 Women 10.81983 Women 11.01984 Women 11.31985 Women 11.31986 Women 11.31987 Women 11.51988 Women 11.81989 Women 12.01990 Women 11.61991 Women 11.91992 Women 12.31993 Women 12.11994 Women 12.31995 Women 12.51996 Women 12.61997 Women 12.51998 Women 12.61999 Women 12.52000 Women 12.32001 Women 12.22002 Women 11.82003 Women 11.12004 Women 11.52005 Women 11.72006 Women 11.72007 Women 11.72008 Women 11.72009 Women 11.42010 Women 11.52011 Women 11.42012 Women 11.42013 Women 11.42014 Women 11.42015 Women 11.12016 Women 11.02017 Women 10.32018 Women 10.62019 Women 10.42020 Women 10.32021 Women 10.42022 Women 10.32023 Women 10.12024 Women 10.0Women, 1996: 12.610.01960198020002020
Smoking rates are from the JT “National Survey of Smoking Rates” (the survey ended in 2018). Deaths and age-adjusted death rates are from the National Cancer Center Japan, Cancer Statistics (national cancer death data from Vital Statistics). Age-adjusted rates use the Showa 60 (1985) model population. The dotted line marks 1996, when the age-adjusted death rate was highest.
Year Male smoking rate Lung cancer deaths Age-adjusted death rate (men) Age-adjusted death rate (women)
1966 83.7% 8,365 19.1 6.8
1975 76.2% 14,759 28.1 8.3
1985 64.6% 28,590 41.5 11.3
1996 57.5% 48,041 48.1 12.6
2005 45.8% 62,063 44.6 11.7
2015 31.0% 74,382 39.2 11.1
2022 ― 76,663 33.9 10.3
2024 24.5% (national survey) 75,569 32.1 10.0

(Age-adjusted death rates are per 100,000 people. The 2024 smoking rate is from the MHLW “National Health and Nutrition Survey, Reiwa 6 (2024)”; it was collected differently from the JT survey.)

If you look only at the top two graphs, it seems that “smoking fell but lung cancer rose.” The bottom graph, the age-adjusted death rate, tells a different story.

Analysis: why lung cancer seems to rise when smokers are decreasing

① Aging: the numbers rise, but at the same ages the rate has fallen

Cancer becomes more common with age. When there are more older people, the number of people with cancer rises even if each person’s risk stays the same.

The age-adjusted death rate removes the effect of differences in age structure so that years can be compared. The age-adjusted lung cancer death rate (men and women combined) peaked at 27.4 in 1996 and fell to 19.9 in 2024 (27% lower).

1975 1996 2024
Lung cancer deaths 14,759 48,041 75,569
Share aged 75 and over 23% 43% 70%
Age-adjusted death rate (men and women combined) 16.9 27.4 19.9

If the 1996 age-specific death rates were applied as they are to the 2024 population, lung cancer deaths would be about 92,000. The actual 2024 figure was about 76,000. In other words, the chance of getting (and dying of) lung cancer at each age has fallen, and the numbers rose because the number of older people grew so much.

② Time lag: the effects of smoking appear after 20 years or more

It takes a long time from starting to smoke to developing lung cancer. In countries such as the UK and the US, where smoking rates are past their peak, men’s lung cancer rates have followed the same shape as smoking rates and began to fall 20 to 25 years later (review by Shong 2025). A Japanese study also points to a “long time lag” between starting to smoke and dying of lung cancer (Funatogawa 2013).

Looking by age group shows this time lag clearly.

Male lung cancer death rate (per 100,000) 1975 1996 2015 2024 Change since 1996
Ages 50–54 20.8 29.2 20.0 12.3 −58%
Ages 60–64 79.7 98.9 88.2 56.0 −43%
Ages 70–74 210.5 319.8 252.1 226.7 −29%
Ages 80–84 191.7 580.0 503.4 440.0 −24%
Age 85 and over 127.4 603.5 723.9 565.5 −6%

(Calculated from National Cancer Center Japan, Cancer Statistics)

  • In the 50s and 60s, rates have fallen sharply since 1996. These are the generations in which fewer people smoke
  • At 85 and over, rates kept rising until 2015 and only then began to fall. This is thought to be because the generations who were adults when about 80% of men smoked have been reaching these ages
  • A study of the Osaka cancer registry also reported that lung cancer incidence by birth cohort “runs almost parallel to smoking rates” (Toyoda 2008)

The reason lung cancer does not fall right away even though there are fewer smokers now is that tobacco’s harm takes time to show up. Much of today’s lung cancer reflects smoking decades ago.

③ More lung cancers are being found: especially early-stage adenocarcinoma

Besides deaths, let us also look at the number of people newly diagnosed with lung cancer.

1975 1996 2015 2023
People newly diagnosed with lung cancer 17,672 59,741 ― 123,989
Age-adjusted incidence rate (men) 33.2 58.5 61.9 56.9
Age-adjusted incidence rate (women) 10.2 16.9 25.3 25.3

(Per 100,000 people. Figures through 2015 are national estimates; from 2016 they are from the National Cancer Registry, which collects data differently. From 2016 to 2023, incidence was roughly flat at 120,000 to 126,000 a year.)

  • The age-adjusted incidence rate for women rose about 2.5 times from 1975 to 2015, but the age-adjusted death rate rose only from 8.3 to 11.1 (about 1.3 times)
  • A study combining three Japanese cancer registries (Nguyen 2022, 1993–2015) found that early-stage adenocarcinoma, where the cancer is still confined within the lung, increased by 4.5% a year in men and 5.7% a year in women. The authors suggest that improved testing (diagnostic methods) making these cancers easier to find may be involved
  • In Taiwan, where fewer than 5% of women smoke, early-stage lung cancer rose more than sixfold once low-dose CT screening became widespread. Advanced-stage lung cancer did not decrease and death rates did not change, so the analysis concluded that most of the increase was “overdiagnosis” (finding cancers that would not threaten life) (Gao 2022)

The rise in newly found lung cancers includes not only an actual increase in disease but also a change in how cancers are found.

④ Lung cancer weakly linked to smoking: lung cancer in people who do not smoke

Lung cancer is often thought of as a “smoker’s disease,” but people who do not smoke get it too.

  • The JACC Study, which pooled three large Japanese follow-up studies, found that the share of lung cancer deaths attributable to smoking was 67% in men and 15% in women (Wakai 2005)
  • A study of 876 Japanese patients who had surgery for non-small cell lung cancer found that 435 (about half) had never smoked (Kawaguchi 2016)

As smokers decrease, the share of lung cancer occurring in people who do not smoke grows. The causes of lung cancer in non-smokers are covered in the next section.

Summary of the analysis

Question Answer
Is lung cancer increasing? The number of people has risen, but the death rate at the same ages has been falling since 1996
Why did the numbers rise? Aging. Seven in ten people who die of lung cancer are 75 or older
Why hasn’t it fallen as fast as smoking rates? The effects of smoking appear 20 or more years later. The generations that smoked heavily are now old
Why are so many people newly diagnosed? Besides aging, early-stage adenocarcinomas are now found by CT and other tests
Is tobacco unrelated? It is related. About two-thirds of lung cancer deaths in men are due to smoking. Age-specific death rates are falling with a lag after smoking rates fell

Lung cancer is classified by the shape of the cancer cells under a microscope (histological type). According to the National Cancer Center Japan, adenocarcinoma is common in women and non-smokers too, while squamous cell carcinoma and small cell carcinoma are strongly associated with smoking.

Type Features Link to smoking
Adenocarcinoma Most common today. Tends to occur deep in the lung (periphery). Common in women and non-smokers Yes (smoking raises the risk), but weaker than for other types
Squamous cell carcinoma Tends to occur in the large bronchi (near the entrance of the lung) Very strong
Small cell carcinoma Grows fast and spreads easily Very strong
Large cell carcinoma Few cases Yes

How many times higher is the risk with smoking

Study Subjects Squamous cell carcinoma Small cell carcinoma Adenocarcinoma
Wakai et al. (2006) Pooled analysis of 22 Japanese studies. Smokers compared with non-smokers Men 11.7 times, women 11.3 times ― Men 2.3 times, women 1.4 times
Pesch et al. (2012) Pooled case-control studies in Europe and Canada (13,169 patients). Men smoking more than 30 cigarettes a day About 104 times About 111 times About 22 times

(The figures from Pesch et al. are odds ratios. It is known that in Japanese people the rise in lung cancer risk from smoking is smaller than in Westerners.)

  • Pooling the Japanese studies, smokers’ risk of lung cancer overall is about 4.4 times that of non-smokers for men and about 2.8 times for women (Wakai 2006)
  • In Pesch et al., risk began to fall early after quitting, but they reported that even after 35 years it did not become the same as that of non-smokers

Fewer smokers changed the mix of types

  • In the Osaka cancer registry, from the 1990s the incidence of squamous cell carcinoma and small cell carcinoma fell while adenocarcinoma kept rising (Toyoda 2008)
  • In three Japanese cancer registries (1993–2015), adenocarcinoma made up 35% of lung cancers in men and 58% in women, the most common type in both. In men, squamous cell carcinoma and small cell carcinoma were decreasing (Nguyen 2022)
  • The national lung cancer screening guideline (fiscal 2025 edition) also decided not to recommend sputum testing, because squamous cell carcinoma near the entrance of the lung, which sputum tests used to detect, is decreasing as smoking rates fall

“Light cigarettes with filters” and adenocarcinoma

Among people who smoke, the share of adenocarcinoma has also grown. The US Surgeon General’s report (2014) concluded that cigarettes with tiny holes in the filter (ventilation holes) that lowered measured tar led to an increase in adenocarcinoma in smokers (as introduced in Song 2017).

  • People think of it as a “light” cigarette and inhale deeper and more
  • The smoke reaches deep into the lungs, where adenocarcinoma tends to form

This is the thinking. “Light cigarettes are safe” is not true.

Lung cancer in people who do not smoke: what is involved

Factor What is known Assessment
Secondhand smoke In a pooled analysis of Japanese studies, people exposed at home had 1.28 times the lung cancer risk (Hori 2016). Women whose husbands smoke had 2.03 times the adenocarcinoma risk (JPHC Study, Kurahashi 2008) National Cancer Center Japan: convincing
Asbestos at work Asbestos inhaled in construction materials, shipbuilding, etc. National Cancer Center Japan: probable
Air pollution (PM2.5) Lung cancer is 16% higher for each 10 μg/m³ increase in PM2.5 (15 follow-up studies, Ciabattini 2021) Many studies. The link is stronger in East Asian studies
Radon A radioactive gas released from soil and rock. In non-smokers’ lung cancer, 15% higher per 100 Bq/m³ (Cheng 2021) Considered a main cause of lung cancer in non-smokers worldwide
Cooking fumes About 2 times in women exposed to cooking oil fumes, 1.2 times with poorly ventilated kitchens (pooled 23 observational studies, Jia 2018) Mainly observational studies
Family history / constitution EGFR gene mutations are common in adenocarcinoma in East Asian women who do not smoke (Mitsudomi 2014) The mutation itself is thought to arise independently of smoking
Pulmonary tuberculosis Past tuberculosis National Cancer Center Japan: possible
  • Healthy people’s lung tissue also contains some cells with EGFR gene mutations (18% of the tissue examined), and a mechanism has been reported in which PM2.5 acts on those cells to promote cancer (Hill 2023, Nature)
  • A study of Japanese women who do not smoke also reported a link between hormone-related factors, such as the timing of menopause, and adenocarcinoma (Wilunda 2021)

What about heated tobacco

In the 2024 national survey, more than 40% of people who smoke (41.4% of men, 44.2% of women) use heated tobacco.

An MHLW research group reviewed studies from 2010 to 2025 and in May 2026 published its “Summary of Findings to Date on Heated Tobacco Products.”

Item The research group’s summary
Components of mainstream smoke Substances produced by combustion, such as carbon monoxide and polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons, are generally lower than in cigarettes. On the other hand, some substances are higher than in cigarettes depending on the product, including the carcinogens tobacco-specific nitrosamines (TSNAs) and acrylamide
Risk assessment of carcinogens NNK, benzo[a]pyrene, and others were judged to have a “high excess cancer incidence.” NNK and benzo[a]pyrene are associated with lung cancer, and the risk is of strong concern
Link to disease in users Cardiovascular disease and nicotine dependence are “strongly associated.” Carcinogenesis (including lung cancer) and COPD are “unable to judge” (no studies directly examined carcinogenesis itself)
Secondhand smoke Harmful substances in the air increase. Carcinogenicity is “unable to judge”

“Unable to judge” does not mean “safe.” Not much time has passed since heated tobacco became widespread, and not enough time has passed to study its link to diseases such as lung cancer that take decades to develop.

The research group also excluded studies conducted or funded by tobacco companies from its judgments.

What you can do for your lungs: by strength of evidence

Actions, foods, and habits said to be “good for the lungs” are lined up here by the strength of assessments from national and international bodies.

Clear evidence

Action What is known
Quit smoking (at any age) In a study of Japanese men, even quitting in their 60s gave a lung cancer death rate in their 70s of 0.60 times that of those who kept smoking (Wakai 2007). The longer since quitting, the lower the risk. In 16 Asian follow-up studies, 15 to 19 years after quitting the risk was still about 2 times that of non-smokers (Yang 2022); the earlier you quit, the better
Avoid secondhand smoke Rated “convincing” as raising risk by the National Cancer Center Japan. Do not smoke, and do not let others smoke, in the house or the car
Workplace dust and asbestos protection Rated “probable” by the National Cancer Center Japan. For demolition and renovation work, follow workplace rules such as wearing dust masks
Lung cancer screening Annual chest X-ray for ages 40 to 79. For ages 50 to 74 with a smoking index (cigarettes per day × years) of 600 or more (including those who quit within the past 15 years), an annual low-dose CT is recommended (National Cancer Center Japan, Guideline fiscal 2025 edition). CT for non-smokers and light smokers is not recommended as national screening (the harms, such as overdiagnosis, may be large)

The same goes for lung function: people who quit smoking had a smaller decline in lung function than those who kept smoking, with the extra decline about 20% of that in continuing smokers (six US follow-up studies, Oelsner 2020). On the other hand, it is also known that for decades after quitting, decline is still slightly faster than in people who never smoked.

Possible (limited research)

Food / habit Assessment
Fruit National Cancer Center Japan: possible (lowers risk). WCRF: “possibly lowers risk (limited)” in current and former smokers
Vegetables National Cancer Center Japan: insufficient data. WCRF: “possibly lowers risk (limited)” in current and former smokers
Foods containing carotenoids (green and yellow vegetables, etc.) WCRF: possibly lowers risk (limited)
Foods containing vitamin C WCRF: possibly lowers risk (limited) in smokers
Foods containing isoflavones, such as soy WCRF: possibly lowers risk (limited) in non-smokers. National Cancer Center Japan: insufficient data
Exercise WCRF: possibly lowers risk (limited). National Cancer Center Japan: insufficient data
  • Fruit and vegetables: a pooled analysis of follow-up studies reported that for each additional 100 g a day, lung cancer was 8% lower for fruit and 6% lower for vegetables, and beyond about 400 g a day there was no further difference (Vieira 2016, analysis for WCRF). However, the link is clear mainly in current and former smokers, and the authors say that “residual confounding by smoking cannot be ruled out” and that “the best way to prevent lung cancer is to eliminate tobacco”
  • Exercise: people with more leisure-time exercise had 24% less lung cancer, but there was no difference in non-smokers (Brenner 2016)
  • Overall diet: one pooled analysis found less lung cancer with diets high in vegetables, fruit, and fish, and 32% more with a “Western” diet high in refined grains, red meat, and processed meat (Zhao 2023)

These are observational studies of what kinds of diets people with less lung cancer had. They do not let us say that “eating X prevents lung cancer.”

What to avoid

Food / habit Assessment
Beta-carotene supplements (high dose) WCRF: raises lung cancer risk in current and former smokers (convincing)
Arsenic in drinking water WCRF: raises lung cancer risk (convincing). Tap water in Japan is controlled by water quality standards
Red meat, processed meat, alcohol WCRF: possibly raises risk (limited). National Cancer Center Japan: insufficient data

Beta-carotene eaten in vegetables and fruit has not been a problem. The problem arose with large amounts taken as supplements.

  • Trial of 29,133 male smokers in Finland (ATBC): a supplement of 20 mg of beta-carotene a day led to 18% more lung cancer
  • Trial of 18,314 US smokers and asbestos workers (CARET): 30 mg of beta-carotene plus vitamin A led to 28% more lung cancer, and the trial was stopped earlier than planned
  • A pooled analysis of randomized trials also found 19% more lung cancer with beta-carotene supplements, and the authors say that “beta-carotene supplements are not recommended for cancer prevention” (Zhang 2023)

Quitting smoking makes far more of a difference than adding “lung-friendly ingredients” in supplements.

For people who want to quit smoking

Ways to quit, and what studies show

Method What is known
Smoking cessation clinic (medical institution) Treatment is covered by health insurance if you meet the conditions (a nicotine dependence test score of 5 or more; for age 35 and over, cigarettes per day × years of 200 or more; wanting to quit right away; written consent). An oral medicine (varenicline) and nicotine patches, among others, are used. Varenicline helps more people quit than using nothing (odds ratio 2.33, Cochrane analysis, Lindson 2023)
Nicotine patches and gum (pharmacies, online) Medicines that supply nicotine in small amounts to ease irritability and other symptoms while quitting. They let about 1.5 times as many people quit as using nothing (summary of 133 trials with 64,000 people, Hartmann-Boyce 2018)
Quit-smoking books and courses The one-day Allen Carr course had about the same quit rate as standard UK stop-smoking support (counseling plus medicine) (19.4% versus 14.8% at 26 weeks, no clear difference, Frings 2020). However, few studies have examined the effect of just reading a book (Possenti 2023)
  • Nicotine patches and gum are medicines. They cannot be used by people who are pregnant or breastfeeding, who have serious heart disease or acute-phase stroke, or who have been diagnosed with depression, among others. If you have a medical condition or take medicines, consult a doctor or pharmacist
  • Nicotine patches (Category 1 medicines) involve a pharmacist’s check even when you buy online
  • Switching to heated tobacco while trying to quit does not count as “quitting” above

Quit-smoking aids and a book (Rakuten Ichiba)

Nicotine patch Nicotine gum Book
Name Nicotinell Patch 20 (14 patches) Nicorette (96 pieces) Allen Carr’s Easy Way to Quit Smoking (“禁煙セラピー”)
Category Category 1 medicine Designated Category 2 medicine Book
How to use (package insert) Apply one patch a day, from waking until bedtime. Patch 20 for the first 6 weeks, then Patch 10 for the next 2 weeks. Up to 8 weeks in a row Chew one piece slowly over 30 to 60 minutes when you feel like smoking. Up to 24 pieces a day. Use for about 3 months Read
Price (tax included) ¥3,361 (shipping extra) ¥5,820 ¥1,500
Store サンドラッグ 楽天24 ヘルスケア館 楽天ブックス
Buy See on Rakuten (サンドラッグ) PR
See on Amazon.co.jp PR
See on Yahoo! Shopping PR
See on Rakuten (楽天24) PR
See on Amazon.co.jp PR
See on Yahoo! Shopping PR
See on Rakuten (楽天ブックス) PR
See on Amazon.co.jp PR

(Checked on the Rakuten Ichiba sales pages on September 29, 2026. Prices and shipping may change. For medicines, read the precautions carefully and follow the dosage and directions.)

Note The indicated effect of nicotine patches and gum is “relief of symptoms such as irritability, difficulty concentrating, and restlessness while quitting smoking.” They are not medicines that prevent lung cancer. If quitting does not go well, you can get advice at a smoking cessation clinic.

Adding fruit and vegetables to everyday meals

Fruit is one of the few foods that the National Cancer Center Japan assesses as “possibly lowering” lung cancer risk. In the studies, differences showed up at up to about 400 g a day (Vieira 2016). The targets in the national “Health Japan 21” are 350 g of vegetables and 200 g of fruit a day.

If it is hard to stock up on vegetables and fruit during daily shopping, one way is to check the quantity and contents with a trial set from a food delivery service. Differences in each company’s standards and fees are summarized in the food delivery comparison article.

Another way is to order fruit directly from the growing region. The sugars and fiber of citrus such as mandarin oranges and oranges are compared across 22 fruits in the fruit fructose article.

Note Food delivery or ordering fruit will not prevent lung cancer. The fruit and vegetable studies are observational, and the link was seen especially in current and former smokers. For people who smoke, the biggest thing is quitting.

Summary

  • The number of lung cancer deaths has risen with aging, but the death rate at the same ages has been falling since 1996
  • The effects of smoking appear 20 or more years later. The generations that smoked heavily are now old and reaching the age for lung cancer
  • Among lung cancers, squamous cell carcinoma and small cell carcinoma are very strongly linked to smoking and are decreasing as smokers decrease. Adenocarcinoma, the most common, is common in non-smokers too, and secondhand smoke, air pollution, radon, constitution, and other factors are also involved. That tests now find early-stage adenocarcinoma is one reason many people are newly diagnosed
  • The link between heated tobacco and lung cancer is still at the “unable to judge” stage
  • What is certain for your lungs is quitting smoking (at any age) and avoiding secondhand smoke. Fruit, vegetables, and exercise are at the “possible” stage, and beta-carotene supplements backfire in smokers
  • People aged 50 to 74 with a smoking index of 600 or more (including those who quit within 15 years) are recommended an annual low-dose CT screening

Sources

Related articles and databases

This article organizes labeling rules and evaluations based on public agencies' documents and research. It does not judge whether any particular food or additive is safe or dangerous. Rules in Japan and abroad change over time (checked 2026-09-29). This is a translation of our Japanese article; if they differ, the Japanese article is the reference.