Why Is Lung Cancer Rising When Fewer People Smoke? Smoking, Lung Cancer Types, and What You Can Do for Your Lungs, Checked Against National Data and Studies

PR This article contains affiliate links to Rakuten Ichiba and A8.net (“See on Rakuten”, “See the trial set”, “【ミヤモトオレンジガーデン本店】”). What is written here is based on national statistics and published studies, whether or not there is an ad. The “See on Amazon.co.jp” and “See on Yahoo! Shopping” links are also affiliate links.
Japan’s male smoking rate fell from 83.7% in 1966 to 27.8% in 2018 (JT “National Survey of Smoking Rates”). In the 2024 national survey, 14.8% of people aged 20 and over smoked habitually (24.5% of men, 6.5% of women) (MHLW “National Health and Nutrition Survey”).
Even so, deaths from lung cancer kept rising and reached a record 76,663 in 2022. They are still above 75,000 a year, and lung cancer is the leading cause of cancer death (National Cancer Center Japan, Cancer Statistics).
Some people ask, “If more people have quit smoking and lung cancer is still rising, doesn’t that mean tobacco has nothing to do with it?”
This article uses national statistics and studies to check:
- Why lung cancer seems to be rising even though fewer people smoke
- How the link to smoking differs by lung cancer type (adenocarcinoma, squamous cell carcinoma, small cell carcinoma, and others)
- What is known about the causes of lung cancer in people who do not smoke
- How solid the evidence is for actions, foods, and habits said to be good for the lungs
Conclusion
- The number of people who die of lung cancer has risen, but the death rate compared at the same ages has been falling since its 1996 peak. The age-adjusted death rate fell 33% for men and 21% for women between 1996 and 2024
- The biggest reason for the rise in numbers is population aging. The share of lung cancer deaths in people aged 75 and over rose from 23% in 1975 to 70% in 2024. If the 1996 age-specific death rates were applied to the 2024 population, deaths would be about 92,000, but the actual figure was about 76,000
- There is a time lag of 20 years or more between smoking and lung cancer. The generations that smoked heavily are now old enough for lung cancer. The lung cancer death rate for men in their 50s and 60s fell by roughly 40% to 60% between 1996 and 2024
- The strength of the link to smoking differs by type of lung cancer. Squamous cell carcinoma and small cell carcinoma are especially strongly linked to smoking: in a Japanese study, male smokers had about 12 times the risk of squamous cell carcinoma of non-smokers. Adenocarcinoma is common in non-smokers too, and smoking raises its risk by a smaller factor, about 2
- As smokers have decreased, squamous cell carcinoma and small cell carcinoma have declined, and adenocarcinoma is now the most common. Adenocarcinomas found at an early stage are increasing in particular, and easier detection through screening is thought to be part of the reason
- Lung cancer in people who do not smoke is linked to secondhand smoke (rated “convincing” by the National Cancer Center Japan), workplace asbestos (“probable”), air pollution (PM2.5), radon, cooking fumes, and more
- The actions with clear evidence for your lungs are quitting smoking (at any age) and avoiding secondhand smoke. Fruit, vegetables, and exercise are at the “possibly lowers risk” level, and beta-carotene supplements are known to raise lung cancer in smokers
- Heated tobacco has fewer harmful substances than cigarettes in many cases, but more of some, and its link to lung cancer is “unable to judge”, according to the May 2026 summary by an MHLW research group
Smoking rates and lung cancer over time
| Year | Male smoking rate | Lung cancer deaths | Age-adjusted death rate (men) | Age-adjusted death rate (women) |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1966 | 83.7% | 8,365 | 19.1 | 6.8 |
| 1975 | 76.2% | 14,759 | 28.1 | 8.3 |
| 1985 | 64.6% | 28,590 | 41.5 | 11.3 |
| 1996 | 57.5% | 48,041 | 48.1 | 12.6 |
| 2005 | 45.8% | 62,063 | 44.6 | 11.7 |
| 2015 | 31.0% | 74,382 | 39.2 | 11.1 |
| 2022 | ― | 76,663 | 33.9 | 10.3 |
| 2024 | 24.5% (national survey) | 75,569 | 32.1 | 10.0 |
(Age-adjusted death rates are per 100,000 people. The 2024 smoking rate is from the MHLW “National Health and Nutrition Survey, Reiwa 6 (2024)”; it was collected differently from the JT survey.)
If you look only at the top two graphs, it seems that “smoking fell but lung cancer rose.” The bottom graph, the age-adjusted death rate, tells a different story.
Analysis: why lung cancer seems to rise when smokers are decreasing
① Aging: the numbers rise, but at the same ages the rate has fallen
Cancer becomes more common with age. When there are more older people, the number of people with cancer rises even if each person’s risk stays the same.
The age-adjusted death rate removes the effect of differences in age structure so that years can be compared. The age-adjusted lung cancer death rate (men and women combined) peaked at 27.4 in 1996 and fell to 19.9 in 2024 (27% lower).
| 1975 | 1996 | 2024 | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Lung cancer deaths | 14,759 | 48,041 | 75,569 |
| Share aged 75 and over | 23% | 43% | 70% |
| Age-adjusted death rate (men and women combined) | 16.9 | 27.4 | 19.9 |
If the 1996 age-specific death rates were applied as they are to the 2024 population, lung cancer deaths would be about 92,000. The actual 2024 figure was about 76,000. In other words, the chance of getting (and dying of) lung cancer at each age has fallen, and the numbers rose because the number of older people grew so much.
② Time lag: the effects of smoking appear after 20 years or more
It takes a long time from starting to smoke to developing lung cancer. In countries such as the UK and the US, where smoking rates are past their peak, men’s lung cancer rates have followed the same shape as smoking rates and began to fall 20 to 25 years later (review by Shong 2025). A Japanese study also points to a “long time lag” between starting to smoke and dying of lung cancer (Funatogawa 2013).
Looking by age group shows this time lag clearly.
| Male lung cancer death rate (per 100,000) | 1975 | 1996 | 2015 | 2024 | Change since 1996 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Ages 50–54 | 20.8 | 29.2 | 20.0 | 12.3 | −58% |
| Ages 60–64 | 79.7 | 98.9 | 88.2 | 56.0 | −43% |
| Ages 70–74 | 210.5 | 319.8 | 252.1 | 226.7 | −29% |
| Ages 80–84 | 191.7 | 580.0 | 503.4 | 440.0 | −24% |
| Age 85 and over | 127.4 | 603.5 | 723.9 | 565.5 | −6% |
(Calculated from National Cancer Center Japan, Cancer Statistics)
- In the 50s and 60s, rates have fallen sharply since 1996. These are the generations in which fewer people smoke
- At 85 and over, rates kept rising until 2015 and only then began to fall. This is thought to be because the generations who were adults when about 80% of men smoked have been reaching these ages
- A study of the Osaka cancer registry also reported that lung cancer incidence by birth cohort “runs almost parallel to smoking rates” (Toyoda 2008)
The reason lung cancer does not fall right away even though there are fewer smokers now is that tobacco’s harm takes time to show up. Much of today’s lung cancer reflects smoking decades ago.
③ More lung cancers are being found: especially early-stage adenocarcinoma
Besides deaths, let us also look at the number of people newly diagnosed with lung cancer.
| 1975 | 1996 | 2015 | 2023 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| People newly diagnosed with lung cancer | 17,672 | 59,741 | ― | 123,989 |
| Age-adjusted incidence rate (men) | 33.2 | 58.5 | 61.9 | 56.9 |
| Age-adjusted incidence rate (women) | 10.2 | 16.9 | 25.3 | 25.3 |
(Per 100,000 people. Figures through 2015 are national estimates; from 2016 they are from the National Cancer Registry, which collects data differently. From 2016 to 2023, incidence was roughly flat at 120,000 to 126,000 a year.)
- The age-adjusted incidence rate for women rose about 2.5 times from 1975 to 2015, but the age-adjusted death rate rose only from 8.3 to 11.1 (about 1.3 times)
- A study combining three Japanese cancer registries (Nguyen 2022, 1993–2015) found that early-stage adenocarcinoma, where the cancer is still confined within the lung, increased by 4.5% a year in men and 5.7% a year in women. The authors suggest that improved testing (diagnostic methods) making these cancers easier to find may be involved
- In Taiwan, where fewer than 5% of women smoke, early-stage lung cancer rose more than sixfold once low-dose CT screening became widespread. Advanced-stage lung cancer did not decrease and death rates did not change, so the analysis concluded that most of the increase was “overdiagnosis” (finding cancers that would not threaten life) (Gao 2022)
The rise in newly found lung cancers includes not only an actual increase in disease but also a change in how cancers are found.
④ Lung cancer weakly linked to smoking: lung cancer in people who do not smoke
Lung cancer is often thought of as a “smoker’s disease,” but people who do not smoke get it too.
- The JACC Study, which pooled three large Japanese follow-up studies, found that the share of lung cancer deaths attributable to smoking was 67% in men and 15% in women (Wakai 2005)
- A study of 876 Japanese patients who had surgery for non-small cell lung cancer found that 435 (about half) had never smoked (Kawaguchi 2016)
As smokers decrease, the share of lung cancer occurring in people who do not smoke grows. The causes of lung cancer in non-smokers are covered in the next section.
Summary of the analysis
| Question | Answer |
|---|---|
| Is lung cancer increasing? | The number of people has risen, but the death rate at the same ages has been falling since 1996 |
| Why did the numbers rise? | Aging. Seven in ten people who die of lung cancer are 75 or older |
| Why hasn’t it fallen as fast as smoking rates? | The effects of smoking appear 20 or more years later. The generations that smoked heavily are now old |
| Why are so many people newly diagnosed? | Besides aging, early-stage adenocarcinomas are now found by CT and other tests |
| Is tobacco unrelated? | It is related. About two-thirds of lung cancer deaths in men are due to smoking. Age-specific death rates are falling with a lag after smoking rates fell |
Types of lung cancer and their link to smoking
Lung cancer is classified by the shape of the cancer cells under a microscope (histological type). According to the National Cancer Center Japan, adenocarcinoma is common in women and non-smokers too, while squamous cell carcinoma and small cell carcinoma are strongly associated with smoking.
| Type | Features | Link to smoking |
|---|---|---|
| Adenocarcinoma | Most common today. Tends to occur deep in the lung (periphery). Common in women and non-smokers | Yes (smoking raises the risk), but weaker than for other types |
| Squamous cell carcinoma | Tends to occur in the large bronchi (near the entrance of the lung) | Very strong |
| Small cell carcinoma | Grows fast and spreads easily | Very strong |
| Large cell carcinoma | Few cases | Yes |
How many times higher is the risk with smoking
| Study | Subjects | Squamous cell carcinoma | Small cell carcinoma | Adenocarcinoma |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Wakai et al. (2006) | Pooled analysis of 22 Japanese studies. Smokers compared with non-smokers | Men 11.7 times, women 11.3 times | ― | Men 2.3 times, women 1.4 times |
| Pesch et al. (2012) | Pooled case-control studies in Europe and Canada (13,169 patients). Men smoking more than 30 cigarettes a day | About 104 times | About 111 times | About 22 times |
(The figures from Pesch et al. are odds ratios. It is known that in Japanese people the rise in lung cancer risk from smoking is smaller than in Westerners.)
- Pooling the Japanese studies, smokers’ risk of lung cancer overall is about 4.4 times that of non-smokers for men and about 2.8 times for women (Wakai 2006)
- In Pesch et al., risk began to fall early after quitting, but they reported that even after 35 years it did not become the same as that of non-smokers
Fewer smokers changed the mix of types
- In the Osaka cancer registry, from the 1990s the incidence of squamous cell carcinoma and small cell carcinoma fell while adenocarcinoma kept rising (Toyoda 2008)
- In three Japanese cancer registries (1993–2015), adenocarcinoma made up 35% of lung cancers in men and 58% in women, the most common type in both. In men, squamous cell carcinoma and small cell carcinoma were decreasing (Nguyen 2022)
- The national lung cancer screening guideline (fiscal 2025 edition) also decided not to recommend sputum testing, because squamous cell carcinoma near the entrance of the lung, which sputum tests used to detect, is decreasing as smoking rates fall
“Light cigarettes with filters” and adenocarcinoma
Among people who smoke, the share of adenocarcinoma has also grown. The US Surgeon General’s report (2014) concluded that cigarettes with tiny holes in the filter (ventilation holes) that lowered measured tar led to an increase in adenocarcinoma in smokers (as introduced in Song 2017).
- People think of it as a “light” cigarette and inhale deeper and more
- The smoke reaches deep into the lungs, where adenocarcinoma tends to form
This is the thinking. “Light cigarettes are safe” is not true.
Lung cancer in people who do not smoke: what is involved
| Factor | What is known | Assessment |
|---|---|---|
| Secondhand smoke | In a pooled analysis of Japanese studies, people exposed at home had 1.28 times the lung cancer risk (Hori 2016). Women whose husbands smoke had 2.03 times the adenocarcinoma risk (JPHC Study, Kurahashi 2008) | National Cancer Center Japan: convincing |
| Asbestos at work | Asbestos inhaled in construction materials, shipbuilding, etc. | National Cancer Center Japan: probable |
| Air pollution (PM2.5) | Lung cancer is 16% higher for each 10 μg/m³ increase in PM2.5 (15 follow-up studies, Ciabattini 2021) | Many studies. The link is stronger in East Asian studies |
| Radon | A radioactive gas released from soil and rock. In non-smokers’ lung cancer, 15% higher per 100 Bq/m³ (Cheng 2021) | Considered a main cause of lung cancer in non-smokers worldwide |
| Cooking fumes | About 2 times in women exposed to cooking oil fumes, 1.2 times with poorly ventilated kitchens (pooled 23 observational studies, Jia 2018) | Mainly observational studies |
| Family history / constitution | EGFR gene mutations are common in adenocarcinoma in East Asian women who do not smoke (Mitsudomi 2014) | The mutation itself is thought to arise independently of smoking |
| Pulmonary tuberculosis | Past tuberculosis | National Cancer Center Japan: possible |
- Healthy people’s lung tissue also contains some cells with EGFR gene mutations (18% of the tissue examined), and a mechanism has been reported in which PM2.5 acts on those cells to promote cancer (Hill 2023, Nature)
- A study of Japanese women who do not smoke also reported a link between hormone-related factors, such as the timing of menopause, and adenocarcinoma (Wilunda 2021)
What about heated tobacco
In the 2024 national survey, more than 40% of people who smoke (41.4% of men, 44.2% of women) use heated tobacco.
An MHLW research group reviewed studies from 2010 to 2025 and in May 2026 published its “Summary of Findings to Date on Heated Tobacco Products.”
| Item | The research group’s summary |
|---|---|
| Components of mainstream smoke | Substances produced by combustion, such as carbon monoxide and polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons, are generally lower than in cigarettes. On the other hand, some substances are higher than in cigarettes depending on the product, including the carcinogens tobacco-specific nitrosamines (TSNAs) and acrylamide |
| Risk assessment of carcinogens | NNK, benzo[a]pyrene, and others were judged to have a “high excess cancer incidence.” NNK and benzo[a]pyrene are associated with lung cancer, and the risk is of strong concern |
| Link to disease in users | Cardiovascular disease and nicotine dependence are “strongly associated.” Carcinogenesis (including lung cancer) and COPD are “unable to judge” (no studies directly examined carcinogenesis itself) |
| Secondhand smoke | Harmful substances in the air increase. Carcinogenicity is “unable to judge” |
“Unable to judge” does not mean “safe.” Not much time has passed since heated tobacco became widespread, and not enough time has passed to study its link to diseases such as lung cancer that take decades to develop.
The research group also excluded studies conducted or funded by tobacco companies from its judgments.
What you can do for your lungs: by strength of evidence
Actions, foods, and habits said to be “good for the lungs” are lined up here by the strength of assessments from national and international bodies.
Clear evidence
| Action | What is known |
|---|---|
| Quit smoking (at any age) | In a study of Japanese men, even quitting in their 60s gave a lung cancer death rate in their 70s of 0.60 times that of those who kept smoking (Wakai 2007). The longer since quitting, the lower the risk. In 16 Asian follow-up studies, 15 to 19 years after quitting the risk was still about 2 times that of non-smokers (Yang 2022); the earlier you quit, the better |
| Avoid secondhand smoke | Rated “convincing” as raising risk by the National Cancer Center Japan. Do not smoke, and do not let others smoke, in the house or the car |
| Workplace dust and asbestos protection | Rated “probable” by the National Cancer Center Japan. For demolition and renovation work, follow workplace rules such as wearing dust masks |
| Lung cancer screening | Annual chest X-ray for ages 40 to 79. For ages 50 to 74 with a smoking index (cigarettes per day × years) of 600 or more (including those who quit within the past 15 years), an annual low-dose CT is recommended (National Cancer Center Japan, Guideline fiscal 2025 edition). CT for non-smokers and light smokers is not recommended as national screening (the harms, such as overdiagnosis, may be large) |
The same goes for lung function: people who quit smoking had a smaller decline in lung function than those who kept smoking, with the extra decline about 20% of that in continuing smokers (six US follow-up studies, Oelsner 2020). On the other hand, it is also known that for decades after quitting, decline is still slightly faster than in people who never smoked.
Possible (limited research)
| Food / habit | Assessment |
|---|---|
| Fruit | National Cancer Center Japan: possible (lowers risk). WCRF: “possibly lowers risk (limited)” in current and former smokers |
| Vegetables | National Cancer Center Japan: insufficient data. WCRF: “possibly lowers risk (limited)” in current and former smokers |
| Foods containing carotenoids (green and yellow vegetables, etc.) | WCRF: possibly lowers risk (limited) |
| Foods containing vitamin C | WCRF: possibly lowers risk (limited) in smokers |
| Foods containing isoflavones, such as soy | WCRF: possibly lowers risk (limited) in non-smokers. National Cancer Center Japan: insufficient data |
| Exercise | WCRF: possibly lowers risk (limited). National Cancer Center Japan: insufficient data |
- Fruit and vegetables: a pooled analysis of follow-up studies reported that for each additional 100 g a day, lung cancer was 8% lower for fruit and 6% lower for vegetables, and beyond about 400 g a day there was no further difference (Vieira 2016, analysis for WCRF). However, the link is clear mainly in current and former smokers, and the authors say that “residual confounding by smoking cannot be ruled out” and that “the best way to prevent lung cancer is to eliminate tobacco”
- Exercise: people with more leisure-time exercise had 24% less lung cancer, but there was no difference in non-smokers (Brenner 2016)
- Overall diet: one pooled analysis found less lung cancer with diets high in vegetables, fruit, and fish, and 32% more with a “Western” diet high in refined grains, red meat, and processed meat (Zhao 2023)
These are observational studies of what kinds of diets people with less lung cancer had. They do not let us say that “eating X prevents lung cancer.”
What to avoid
| Food / habit | Assessment |
|---|---|
| Beta-carotene supplements (high dose) | WCRF: raises lung cancer risk in current and former smokers (convincing) |
| Arsenic in drinking water | WCRF: raises lung cancer risk (convincing). Tap water in Japan is controlled by water quality standards |
| Red meat, processed meat, alcohol | WCRF: possibly raises risk (limited). National Cancer Center Japan: insufficient data |
Beta-carotene eaten in vegetables and fruit has not been a problem. The problem arose with large amounts taken as supplements.
- Trial of 29,133 male smokers in Finland (ATBC): a supplement of 20 mg of beta-carotene a day led to 18% more lung cancer
- Trial of 18,314 US smokers and asbestos workers (CARET): 30 mg of beta-carotene plus vitamin A led to 28% more lung cancer, and the trial was stopped earlier than planned
- A pooled analysis of randomized trials also found 19% more lung cancer with beta-carotene supplements, and the authors say that “beta-carotene supplements are not recommended for cancer prevention” (Zhang 2023)
Quitting smoking makes far more of a difference than adding “lung-friendly ingredients” in supplements.
For people who want to quit smoking
Ways to quit, and what studies show
| Method | What is known |
|---|---|
| Smoking cessation clinic (medical institution) | Treatment is covered by health insurance if you meet the conditions (a nicotine dependence test score of 5 or more; for age 35 and over, cigarettes per day × years of 200 or more; wanting to quit right away; written consent). An oral medicine (varenicline) and nicotine patches, among others, are used. Varenicline helps more people quit than using nothing (odds ratio 2.33, Cochrane analysis, Lindson 2023) |
| Nicotine patches and gum (pharmacies, online) | Medicines that supply nicotine in small amounts to ease irritability and other symptoms while quitting. They let about 1.5 times as many people quit as using nothing (summary of 133 trials with 64,000 people, Hartmann-Boyce 2018) |
| Quit-smoking books and courses | The one-day Allen Carr course had about the same quit rate as standard UK stop-smoking support (counseling plus medicine) (19.4% versus 14.8% at 26 weeks, no clear difference, Frings 2020). However, few studies have examined the effect of just reading a book (Possenti 2023) |
- Nicotine patches and gum are medicines. They cannot be used by people who are pregnant or breastfeeding, who have serious heart disease or acute-phase stroke, or who have been diagnosed with depression, among others. If you have a medical condition or take medicines, consult a doctor or pharmacist
- Nicotine patches (Category 1 medicines) involve a pharmacist’s check even when you buy online
- Switching to heated tobacco while trying to quit does not count as “quitting” above
Quit-smoking aids and a book (Rakuten Ichiba)
| Nicotine patch | Nicotine gum | Book | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Name | Nicotinell Patch 20 (14 patches) | Nicorette (96 pieces) | Allen Carr’s Easy Way to Quit Smoking (“禁煙セラピー”) |
| Category | Category 1 medicine | Designated Category 2 medicine | Book |
| How to use (package insert) | Apply one patch a day, from waking until bedtime. Patch 20 for the first 6 weeks, then Patch 10 for the next 2 weeks. Up to 8 weeks in a row | Chew one piece slowly over 30 to 60 minutes when you feel like smoking. Up to 24 pieces a day. Use for about 3 months | Read |
| Price (tax included) | ¥3,361 (shipping extra) | ¥5,820 | ¥1,500 |
| Store | サンドラッグ | 楽天24 ヘルスケア館 | 楽天ブックス |
| Buy | See on Rakuten (サンドラッグ) PR See on Amazon.co.jp PR See on Yahoo! Shopping PR |
See on Rakuten (楽天24) PR See on Amazon.co.jp PR See on Yahoo! Shopping PR |
See on Rakuten (楽天ブックス) PR See on Amazon.co.jp PR |
(Checked on the Rakuten Ichiba sales pages on September 29, 2026. Prices and shipping may change. For medicines, read the precautions carefully and follow the dosage and directions.)
Note The indicated effect of nicotine patches and gum is “relief of symptoms such as irritability, difficulty concentrating, and restlessness while quitting smoking.” They are not medicines that prevent lung cancer. If quitting does not go well, you can get advice at a smoking cessation clinic.
Adding fruit and vegetables to everyday meals
Fruit is one of the few foods that the National Cancer Center Japan assesses as “possibly lowering” lung cancer risk. In the studies, differences showed up at up to about 400 g a day (Vieira 2016). The targets in the national “Health Japan 21” are 350 g of vegetables and 200 g of fruit a day.
If it is hard to stock up on vegetables and fruit during daily shopping, one way is to check the quantity and contents with a trial set from a food delivery service. Differences in each company’s standards and fees are summarized in the food delivery comparison article.
Another way is to order fruit directly from the growing region. The sugars and fiber of citrus such as mandarin oranges and oranges are compared across 22 fruits in the fruit fructose article.
Note Food delivery or ordering fruit will not prevent lung cancer. The fruit and vegetable studies are observational, and the link was seen especially in current and former smokers. For people who smoke, the biggest thing is quitting.
Summary
- The number of lung cancer deaths has risen with aging, but the death rate at the same ages has been falling since 1996
- The effects of smoking appear 20 or more years later. The generations that smoked heavily are now old and reaching the age for lung cancer
- Among lung cancers, squamous cell carcinoma and small cell carcinoma are very strongly linked to smoking and are decreasing as smokers decrease. Adenocarcinoma, the most common, is common in non-smokers too, and secondhand smoke, air pollution, radon, constitution, and other factors are also involved. That tests now find early-stage adenocarcinoma is one reason many people are newly diagnosed
- The link between heated tobacco and lung cancer is still at the “unable to judge” stage
- What is certain for your lungs is quitting smoking (at any age) and avoiding secondhand smoke. Fruit, vegetables, and exercise are at the “possible” stage, and beta-carotene supplements backfire in smokers
- People aged 50 to 74 with a smoking index of 600 or more (including those who quit within 15 years) are recommended an annual low-dose CT screening
Sources
- National Cancer Center Japan, Cancer Information Service, “Cancer Statistics” tables (national cancer deaths 1958–2024, national cancer incidence 1975–2015, National Cancer Registry 2016–2023) https://ganjoho.jp/reg_stat/statistics/data/dl/index.html
- National Cancer Center Japan, Cancer Information Service, “Lung Cancer: Basics” https://ganjoho.jp/public/cancer/lung/about.html
- National Cancer Center Japan, Institute for Cancer Control, “List of Assessments of Cancer Risk and Preventive Factors” ver.20260526 https://epi.ncc.go.jp/can_prev/outcome/index.html
- National Cancer Center Japan, “Lung Cancer Screening Guideline Based on Evaluation of Effectiveness,” fiscal 2025 edition https://canscreen.ncc.go.jp/guideline/lung_guideline2025.pdf
- MHLW, “Summary of the Reiwa 6 (2024) National Health and Nutrition Survey” https://www.mhlw.go.jp/content/10900000/001603146.pdf
- MHLW, 5th Expert Committee on Secondhand Smoke Measures, Material 3, “Summary of Findings to Date on Heated Tobacco Products” (May 21, 2026) https://www.mhlw.go.jp/content/10904750/001702543.pdf
- JT, “National Survey of Smoking Rates” (1965–2018; table reprinted by Health Net https://www.health-net.or.jp/tobacco/statistics/jt.html )
- World Cancer Research Fund / AICR, “Diet, nutrition, physical activity and lung cancer” (CUP, 2017, revised 2018) https://www.wcrf.org/wp-content/uploads/2024/10/lung-cancer-report.pdf
- Wakai K et al. (2006) Jpn J Clin Oncol. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/16735374/
- Wakai K et al. (2005) J Epidemiol (JACC Study). https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/16127225/
- Wakai K et al. (2007) Cancer Sci (age at quitting). https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/17425595/
- Pesch B et al. (2012) Int J Cancer. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/22052329/
- Toyoda Y et al. (2008) Jpn J Clin Oncol. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/18689853/
- Nguyen PT et al. (2022) Int J Cancer. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/35138642/
- Funatogawa I et al. (2013) Bull World Health Organ. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/23678196/
- Shong et al. (2025) Emerging Trends in Global Lung Cancer Burden. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/40812348/
- Song MA et al. (2017) J Natl Cancer Inst. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/28525914/
- Gao W et al. (2022) JAMA Intern Med. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/35040922/
- Kawaguchi T et al. (2016) J Clin Oncol (JME Study). https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/27161973/
- Mitsudomi T (2014) Transl Lung Cancer Res. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/25806302/
- Hill W et al. (2023) Nature. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/37020004/
- Hori M et al. (2016) Jpn J Clin Oncol. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/27511987/
- Kurahashi N et al. (2008) Int J Cancer (JPHC Study). https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/17935128/
- Wilunda C et al. (2021) Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/33827981/
- Ciabattini M et al. (2021) Environ Res. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/33181136/
- Cheng ES et al. (2021) Eur Respir Rev. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/33536262/
- Jia PL et al. (2018) J Cancer Res Clin Oncol. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/29164315/
- Yang JJ et al. (2022) Int J Epidemiol. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/34999862/
- Oelsner EC et al. (2020) Lancet Respir Med. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/31606435/
- Vieira AR et al. (2016) Ann Oncol. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/26371287/
- Brenner DR et al. (2016) Lung Cancer. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/27040847/
- Zhao J et al. (2023) Curr Nutr Rep. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/37097371/
- ATBC Cancer Prevention Study Group (1994) N Engl J Med. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/8127329/
- Omenn GS et al. (1996) N Engl J Med (CARET). https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/8602180/
- Zhang Y et al. (2023) Nutr Rev. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/36715090/
- Hartmann-Boyce J et al. (2018) Cochrane Database Syst Rev. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/29852054/
- Lindson N et al. (2023) Cochrane Database Syst Rev. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/37696529/
- Frings D et al. (2020) Addiction. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/31968400/
- Possenti I et al. (2023) Tob Prev Cessat. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/37780488/
- Conditions for insurance coverage of smoking cessation treatment: Haleon Japan, “Ii Kin-en” https://www.e-kinen.jp/hospital/insurance.html
- Rakuten Ichiba sales pages for サンドラッグ “Nicotinell Patch 20, 14 patches,” 楽天24 ヘルスケア館 “Nicorette, 96 pieces,” and 楽天ブックス “禁煙セラピー” (checked September 29, 2026)
Related articles and databases
- Does Eating Too Much Wheat Flour Cause Colorectal Cancer? Checking the Link Between Wheat and Cancer Against Studies and Government Data
- Comparing 5 additive-conscious grocery delivery services: trial sets, ongoing costs, and additive standards (2026)
- What Is “植物油脂” (Vegetable Fat)? How True Is “Vegetable Oils Are Bad for You,” and What the Back Label Does and Does Not Tell You
- What Are Tumor Markers? Origins, Types, Positive Rates by Cancer, Cost, and How to Read Results, Checked Against Society Guidelines and Studies
- Does the Type of Alcohol Change Cancer Risk? Which Cancers Rise, Which Show Lower Numbers, and Whether Drinking Has Benefits, Checked Against International Assessments and Studies
- Is Alcohol a Cause of Pancreatic Cancer? Drinking Amounts, Other Causes, and the Latest Treatments, Checked Against National Data and Studies