日本語
Pesticide databaseExplainerChecked 2026-10-01

Does Japan use a lot of pesticides? Trends and international comparison

Use per hectare of cropland compared internationally, and trends in Japan’s shipments

In short

Measured as use per hectare of cropland, Japan is at 10.06 kg (2024, FAO estimate), 2 to 4 times the level in Europe and the United States. It is lower than South Korea (13.03 kg), however, and Japan’s figure has been falling from 15.22 kg in 1990.

Government material says that the Asian monsoon region, which includes Japan, has “weather conditions and production structures that differ from those of Europe and the United States.” Note that amount per area alone does not allow a simple comparison.

Use per hectare of cropland (international comparison)

Pesticide use per hectare of cropland (active ingredients, 2024, kg/ha) FAOSTAT estimates. South Korea 13.03, Brazil 11.85, Japan 10.06, Netherlands 7.51, Italy 4.29, France 3.9, Germany 3.81, Spain 3.63, EU27 average (weighted, calculated) 2.9, United States 2.78, United Kingdom 2.75, World 2.49, China (mainland) 1.88, Europe (FAO regional total) 1.65, India 0.24 (kg/ha). 0 5 10 South Korea 13.03 Brazil 11.85 Japan 10.06 Netherlands 7.51 Italy 4.29 France 3.9 Germany 3.81 Spain 3.63 EU27 average (weighted, calculated) 2.9 United States 2.78 United Kingdom 2.75 World 2.49 China (mainland) 1.88 Europe (FAO regional total) 1.65 India 0.24 Source: FAOSTAT Pesticides Use (FAO estimates). EU27 is calculated from country values
Figure: Pesticide use per hectare of cropland (active ingredients, kg/ha, 2024)
  • The FAOSTAT figure is FAO’s estimate: the amount of active ingredient each country reported using (about 43,000 t for Japan in 2024) divided by its cropland area.
  • Japan’s figure went from 15.22 kg/ha in 1990 to 10.06 kg/ha in 2024.
  • FAOSTAT has no aggregate for the EU27, so the figure here (2.90 kg/ha) is calculated from the values of the 27 countries.
  • A caution when comparing: an industry group (CropLife Japan) explains that amount per area alone does not allow a simple comparison, because of the high share of crops such as fruit trees that use more pesticide, and because of Japan’s hot, humid climate. Government material goes no further than saying that “weather conditions and production structures differ.”

Japan’s shipments are falling

Pesticide shipments in Japan (formulated products, t or kl) Shipments of formulated products by pesticide year: 2014 236,545; 2015 227,779; 2016 228,050; 2017 227,680; 2018 223,207; 2019 221,821; 2020 222,136; 2021 226,478; 2022 226,248; 2023 207,621; 2024 205,148 (t or kl). Generally declining. 0 50k 100k 150k 200k 250k 237k 2014 228k 2015 228k 2016 228k 2017 223k 2018 222k 2019 222k 2020 226k 2021 226k 2022 208k 2023 205k 2024 Pesticide year (previous October to September). Source: MAFF, “Situation surrounding pesticides” (January 2026)
Figure: Pesticide shipments in Japan (formulated products, t or kl)
  • Shipments of formulated products were 205,148 t or kl in the 2024 pesticide year. Shipments in fiscal 2017 had fallen to 44% of the level in fiscal 1989 (the first year of the Heisei era) (MHLW-funded research).
  • About 24% of the technical-grade material (active ingredient) is imported (MAFF, “Situation surrounding pesticides”).
  • Shipments (formulated products, about 205,000 t) and FAOSTAT (active ingredients, about 43,000 t) count different things, so they differ by an order of magnitude.

Differences between the ingredients usable in Japan and in the EU

Among the ingredients in this database, 76 are registered in Japan but not approved in the EU. In 2018 the EU banned outdoor use of three neonicotinoid ingredients (clothianidin, imidacloprid and thiamethoxam).

Conversely, ingredients approved in the EU but not registered in Japan (or whose registration has expired):

Reasons for non-approval in the EU include effects on the environment, such as on honeybees and groundwater. Non-approval does not mean that food containing the pesticide immediately harms health. With the 2018 revision of the Agricultural Chemicals Regulation Act, Japan also began a “re-evaluation” system that periodically reviews registered pesticides.

Sources

Last checked 2026-10-01. Systems and figures change over time. This page is a translation of our Japanese page; if they differ, the Japanese page is the reference.

This page lists facts from laws, public agencies' documents and peer-reviewed papers. It does not judge whether any particular pesticide or farming method is good or bad.

Other explainers

← Back to the pesticide database